+1 (binding)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm bumping this old vote thread once more. > > If we want to add Java 17 support at some point, we will need to update > our Scala 2.12 version (see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25000). As explained before > in the discussion thread, that means that we would break binary & savepoint > compatibility for Flink's Scala users. > > Best regards, > > Martijn > > On 2022/06/11 13:39:54 Konstantin Knauf wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Am Fr., 10. Juni 2022 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Ran Tao < > chucheng...@gmail.com>: > > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > > > for that we can't always block at 2.12.7. but we should let users know > > > about this binary incompatibility if execute this update. > > > btw, the configuration > > > of scala-maven-plugin may need to update to match target-8, target-11 > jvm > > > format. > > > > > > > > > Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org>于2022年6月10日 周五18:32写道： > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > As previously discussed [1] I would like to open a vote thread for > > > updating > > > > Flink from Scala 2.12.7 to Scala 2.12.16 and accept that there will > be a > > > > binary incompatibility when this upgrade is executed. > > > > > > > > For this vote, I'm following the FLIP criteria since I think that > best > > > fits > > > > with this proposal. That means that the vote will be open for at > least 72 > > > > hours unless there is an objection or not enough votes. Any > committer can > > > > provide a binding vote. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Martijn Visser > > > > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82 > > > > https://github.com/MartijnVisser > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/9ft0tbhj45fplt5j3gtb7jzbt4tdr6rh > > > > > > > -- > > > Best, > > > Ran Tao > > > > > > > > > -- > > https://twitter.com/snntrable > > https://github.com/knaufk > > >
