Thanks for clarification. I'm gonna leave the branch and document it accordingly in [1].
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Release+Management On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 1:29 PM Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> wrote: > I don't think we could use only flink-table-planner-blink related code to > represent the whole blink branch. There still existed some code changes in > flink-runtime, flink-streaming-java, flink-yarn and some other modules. > However, > some features are not included in the current flink main branch due to > some historical reasons. > From my point of view, as part of the history of Flink community evolution, > we don't need to drop the blink branch. > > Best > Yun Tang > ------------------------------ > *From:* Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 1, 2023 19:27 > *To:* Matthias Pohl <matthias.p...@aiven.io> > *Cc:* dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org> > *Subject:* Re: [DISCUSS] Delete useless branches from Flink repository > > The blink branch was created when Alibaba contributes its internal Flink > version to Flink Community, blink related code(e.g. > flink-table-planner-blink, flink-table-runtime-blink) have been adopted as > the default code (flink-table-planner, flink-table-runtime)[1], I think we > can remove it now safely. > > Best, > Leonard > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14437 > > > > On Feb 1, 2023, at 7:10 PM, Matthias Pohl <matthias.p...@aiven.io> > wrote: > > > > I'm documenting the branches that shouldn't be deleted in the release > management docs [1]. While going through the remote branches I noticed the > remote branch blink [2] which was created by Kurt in 2019. It feels like > that one could be deleted as well. > > > > Are there any objections in deleting the blink remote branch? @Leonard > was there any reason you skipped that one? > > > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Release+Management > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Release+Management > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/blink < > https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/blink> > > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 11:26 AM Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com < > mailto:xbjt...@gmail.com <xbjt...@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > Thanks Yun Tang for joining the discussion. > > > > I’ve deleted these branches with same name tag except > release-1.14.6-rc2 which has no same name tag. > > > > release-1.12.3-rc1 > > release-1.13.2-rc2 > > release-1.14.3-rc1 > > release-1.15.0-rc1 > > release-1.14.6-rc2 > > > > Best, > > Leonard > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Leonard, > > > > > > Thanks for driving this topic, I think the release candidate branch > after flink-1.10 could be deleted. > > > > > > I believe those branches are created by mistake as the release manager > should use tags instead of branch to hold the release candidate. > > > Those branches are: > > > release-1.12.3-rc1 > > > release-1.13.2-rc2 > > > release-1.14.3-rc1 > > > release-1.14.6-rc2 > > > release-1.15.0-rc1 > > > > > > > > > Best > > > Yun Tang > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com <mailto:xbjt...@gmail.com > <xbjt...@gmail.com>>> > > > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 20:07 > > > To: dev@flink.apache.org <mailto:dev@flink.apache.org > <dev@flink.apache.org>> <dev@flink.apache.org <mailto:dev@flink.apache.org > <dev@flink.apache.org>>> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Delete useless branches from Flink repository > > > > > > > > >> Actually I double checked it and the default branch on jenkins is > `master`. > > > > > > Great, I’ve deleted benchmark-request branch. Now, our repo looks > better. > > > > > > Best, > > > Leonard > > > >
