Hi Shammon,

Sure, could you help to draft a subsection about this in the google doc?

Best,
Jark

> 2023年8月14日 20:30,Shammon FY <zjur...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> Thanks @Jark for driving the Flink Roadmap. 
> 
> As we discussed olap in the thread [1] and according to the suggestions from 
> @Xingtong Song, could we add a subsection in `Towards Streaming Warehouses` 
> or `Performance` that the short-lived query in Flink Session Cluster is one 
> of the future directions for Flink?
> 
> Best,
> Shammon FY
> 
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 8:03 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:imj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Thank you everyone for helping polish the roadmap [1].
>> 
>> I think I have addressed all the comments and we have included all ongoing
>> parts of Flink.
>> Please feel free to take a last look. I'm going to prepare the pull request
>> if there are no more concerns.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Jark
>> 
>> [1]:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/12BDiVKEsY-f7HI3suO_IxwzCmR04QcVqLarXgyJAb7c/edit
>> 
>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 at 13:04, Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:yuanmei.w...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> > Sorry for taking so long
>> >
>> > I've added a section about Flink Disaggregated State Management Evolution
>> > in the attached doc.
>> >
>> > I found some of the contents might be overlapped with the "large-scale
>> > streaming jobs". So that part might need some changes as well.
>> >
>> > Please let me know what you think.
>> >
>> > Best
>> > Yuan
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:07 PM Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com 
>> > <mailto:yuanmei.w...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Sorry have missed this email and respond a bit late.
>> > >
>> > > I will put a draft for the long-term vision for the state as well as
>> > > large-scale state support into the roadmap.
>> > >
>> > > Best
>> > > Yuan
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:34 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com 
>> > > <mailto:imj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Jiabao,
>> > >>
>> > >> Thank you for your suggestions. I have added them to the "Going Beyond a
>> > >> SQL Stream/Batch Processing Engine" and "Large-Scale State Jobs"
>> > sections.
>> > >>
>> > >> Best,
>> > >> Jark
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 16:06, Jiabao Sun <jiabao....@xtransfer.cn 
>> > >> <mailto:jiabao....@xtransfer.cn>
>> > >> .invalid>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Thanks Jark and Martijn for driving this.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > There are two suggestions about the Table API:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > - Add the JSON type to adapt to the no sql database type.
>> > >> > - Remove changelog normalize operator for upsert stream.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Best,
>> > >> > Jiabao
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > 2023年7月13日 下午3:49,Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com 
>> > >> > > <mailto:imj...@gmail.com>> 写道:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Hi all,
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Sorry for taking so long back here.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Martijn and I have drafted the first version of the updated roadmap,
>> > >> > > including the updated feature radar reflecting the current state of
>> > >> > > different components.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/12BDiVKEsY-f7HI3suO_IxwzCmR04QcVqLarXgyJAb7c/edit
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Feel free to leave comments in the thread or the document.
>> > >> > > We may miss mentioning something important, so your help in
>> > enriching
>> > >> > > the content is greatly appreciated.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Best,
>> > >> > > Jark & Martijn
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 00:50, Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> Hi Jark,
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> Fair enough. Let's do it like you suggested. Thanks!
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> Best regards,
>> > >> > >> Jing
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 6:00 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com 
>> > >> > >> <mailto:imj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >>> Hi Jing,
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> This thread is for discussing the roadmap for versions 1.18, 2.0,
>> > >> and
>> > >> > >> even
>> > >> > >>> more.
>> > >> > >>> One of the outcomes of this discussion will be an updated version
>> > of
>> > >> > the
>> > >> > >>> current roadmap.
>> > >> > >>> Let's work together on refining the roadmap in this thread.
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> Best,
>> > >> > >>> Jark
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 23:25, Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>>> Hi Jark,
>> > >> > >>>>
>> > >> > >>>> Thanks for driving it! For point 2, since we are developing 1.18
>> > >> now,
>> > >> > >>>> does it make sense to update the roadmap this time while we are
>> > >> > >> releasing
>> > >> > >>>> 1.18? This discussion thread will be focusing on the Flink 2.0
>> > >> > roadmap,
>> > >> > >>> as
>> > >> > >>>> you mentioned previously. WDYT?
>> > >> > >>>>
>> > >> > >>>> Best regards,
>> > >> > >>>> Jing
>> > >> > >>>>
>> > >> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 3:31 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com 
>> > >> > >>>> <mailto:imj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >> > >>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> Hi all,
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> Martijn and I would like to initiate a discussion on the Flink
>> > >> > >> roadmap,
>> > >> > >>>>> which should cover the project's long-term roadmap and the
>> > regular
>> > >> > >>> update
>> > >> > >>>>> mechanism.
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> Xintong has already started a discussion about Flink 2.0
>> > planning.
>> > >> > >> One
>> > >> > >>> of
>> > >> > >>>>> the points raised in that discussion is that we should have a
>> > >> > >>> high-level
>> > >> > >>>>> discussion of the roadmap to present where the project is
>> > heading
>> > >> > >>> (which
>> > >> > >>>>> doesn't necessarily need to block the Flink 2.0 planning).
>> > >> Moreover,
>> > >> > >>> the
>> > >> > >>>>> roadmap on the Flink website [1] hasn't been updated for half a
>> > >> year,
>> > >> > >>> and
>> > >> > >>>>> the last update was for the feature radar for the 1.15 release.
>> > It
>> > >> > >> has
>> > >> > >>>> been
>> > >> > >>>>> 2 years since the community discussed Flink's overall roadmap.
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> I would like to raise two topics for discussion:
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> 1. The new roadmap. This should be an updated version of the
>> > >> current
>> > >> > >>>>> roadmap[1].
>> > >> > >>>>> 2. A mechanism to regularly discuss and update the roadmap.
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> To make the first topic discussion more efficient, Martijn and I
>> > >> > >>>> volunteer
>> > >> > >>>>> to summarize the ongoing big things of different components and
>> > >> > >>> present a
>> > >> > >>>>> roadmap draft to the community in the next few weeks. This
>> > should
>> > >> be
>> > >> > >> a
>> > >> > >>>> good
>> > >> > >>>>> starting point for a more detailed discussion.
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> Regarding the regular update mechanism, there was a proposal in
>> > a
>> > >> > >>> thread
>> > >> > >>>>> [2] three years ago to make the release manager responsible for
>> > >> > >>> updating
>> > >> > >>>>> the roadmap. However, it appears that this was not documented
>> > as a
>> > >> > >>>> release
>> > >> > >>>>> management task [3], and the roadmap update wasn't performed for
>> > >> > >>> releases
>> > >> > >>>>> 1.16 and 1.17.
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> In my opinion, making release managers responsible for keeping
>> > the
>> > >> > >>>> roadmap
>> > >> > >>>>> up to date is a good idea. Specifically, release managers of
>> > >> release
>> > >> > >> X
>> > >> > >>>> can
>> > >> > >>>>> kick off the roadmap update at the beginning of release X, which
>> > >> can
>> > >> > >>> be a
>> > >> > >>>>> joint task with collecting a feature list [4]. Additionally,
>> > >> release
>> > >> > >>>>> managers of release X-1 can help verify and remove the
>> > >> accomplished
>> > >> > >>> items
>> > >> > >>>>> from the roadmap and update the feature radar.
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> What do you think? Do you have other ideas?
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> Best,
>> > >> > >>>>> Jark & Martijn
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>> [1]: https://flink.apache.org/roadmap.html
>> > >> > >>>>> [2]:
>> > >> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/o0l3cg6yphxwrww0k7215jgtw3yfoybv
>> > >> > >>>>> [3]:
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Release+Management
>> > >> > >>>>> [4]:
>> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/1.18+Release
>> > >> > >>>>>
>> > >> > >>>>
>> > >> > >>>
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >

Reply via email to