Thanks Yun Tang for driving the release. 

Just wanted to double check whether the following two fixes will be included in 
1.17.2 release:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30559
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30966

Thanks
Jun

> On 9. Nov 2023, at 04:48, Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Thank you for your feedback!
> 
> As there are no other concerns or objections, and currently I am not aware of 
> any unresolved blockers.
> 
> I will kick off the release process and start preparing for the RC1 version 
> from today.
> 
> 
> Best
> Yun Tang
> ________________________________
> From: Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 11:10
> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> Cc: rui fan <1996fan...@gmail.com>; yuchen.e...@gmail.com 
> <yuchen.e...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.17.2
> 
> Thanks Yun for picking this.
> 
> +1
> 
> Best,
> Leonard
> 
> 
>> 2023年11月8日 上午9:23,Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 写道:
>> 
>> +1 thanks Yun
>> 
>> 1.17.2 is really important.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Jingsong
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:32 AM Danny Cranmer <dannycran...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1, thanks for picking this up.
>>> 
>>> I am happy to help out with the bits you need PMC support for.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danny
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 4:03 AM Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi @casel.chen<mailto:casel_c...@126.com>
>>>> 
>>>> It seems FLINK-33365 is more related to JDBC connector than the Flink
>>>> runtime, and the discussion will focus on the release of Flink-1.17.2.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best
>>>> Yun Tang
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: casel.chen <casel_c...@126.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 16:04
>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
>>>> Cc: rui fan <1996fan...@gmail.com>; yuchen.e...@gmail.com <
>>>> yuchen.e...@gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.17.2
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33365 fixed or not in release
>>>> 1.17.2?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> At 2023-11-07 09:47:29, "liu ron" <ron9....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Ron
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> 于2023年11月6日周一 22:07写道:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> Thanks for your effort!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Jing
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 1:15 AM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank you for picking it up! +1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Konstantin
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 03:48 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <myas...@live.com
>>>>> :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I would like to discuss creating a new 1.17 patch release (1.17.2).
>>>> The
>>>>>>>> last 1.17 release is near half a year old, and since then, 79
>>>> tickets
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> been closed [1], of which 15 are blocker/critical [2]. Some
>>>>>>>> of them are quite important, such as FLINK-32758 [3], FLINK-32296
>>>> [4],
>>>>>>>> FLINK-32548 [5]
>>>>>>>> and FLINK-33010[6].
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> In addition to this, FLINK-33149 [7] is important to bump
>>>> snappy-java
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> 1.1.10.4.
>>>>>>>> Although FLINK-33149 is unresolved, it was done in 1.17.2.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I am not aware of any unresolved blockers and there are no
>>>> in-progress
>>>>>>>> tickets [8]. Please let me know if there are any issues you'd like
>>>> to
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> included in this release but still not merged.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If the community agrees to create this new patch release, I could
>>>>>>>> volunteer as the release manager with Yu Chen.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Since there will be another flink-1.16.3 release request during the
>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>> time, we will work with Rui Fan since many issues will be fixed in
>>>> both
>>>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.17.2%20%20and%20resolution%20%20!%3D%20%20Unresolved%20order%20by%20priority%20DESC
>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.17.2%20and%20resolution%20%20!%3D%20Unresolved%20%20and%20priority%20in%20(Blocker%2C%20Critical)%20ORDER%20by%20priority%20%20DESC
>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32758
>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32296
>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32548
>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33010
>>>>>>>> [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33149
>>>>>>>> [8] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12353260
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>> Yun Tang
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/snntrable
>>>>>>> https://github.com/knaufk
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
> 

Reply via email to