> > I would like to ask if there is any plan to review and refactor the CLI in > Flink 2.0. >
Not that I'm aware of. I have the impression of seeing discussions about not using CLI options and using only "-Dconfig.key", but I cannot find it now. I personally think that is a good direction to go, and should also solve the problem mentioned in your example. My biggest concern is whether there are contributors with enough capacity to work on it. Feel free to pick it up if you'd like to. Best, Xintong On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:37 AM Zakelly Lan <zakelly....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Xintong, > > Thanks for driving this. > > I would like to ask if there is any plan to review and refactor the CLI in > Flink 2.0. I recently found that the CLI commands and parameters are > confusing in some ways (e.g. > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23253#discussion_r1405707256). It > would be beneficial to offer a more intuitive and straightforward CLI > command to enhance usability. > > > Best, > Zakelly > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 10:45 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks a lot for offering the help, Rui. The plan sounds good to me. I'll > > put your name and the milestones into the 2.0 wiki page. > > > > Best, > > > > Xintong > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 10:38 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Xintong for promoting the progress of Flink 2.0. > > > > > > If no one minds, I'd like to pick this one: Use Java’s Duration instead > > of > > > Flink’s Time. > > > Could I assign FLINK-14068[1] to me? > > > > > > My expected progress is: > > > - Mark org.apache.flink.api.common.time.Time and > > > org.apache.flink.streaming.api.windowing.time.Time > > > as @Deprecated in 1.19 (Must do in 1.19) > > > - Refactor all usages of them to Java's Duration(Nice do in 1.19, must > do > > > in 1.20) > > > - Remove them in 2.0 > > > > > > Is this plan reasonable? > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14068 > > > > > > Best, > > > Rui > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:18 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi devs, > > >> > > >> The release managers have been tracking the progress of release 2.0 > work > > >> items. Unfortunately, some of the items are not in good progress, and > > >> either don't have a contributor or the original contributor no longer > > has > > >> capacity to work on them. We have already tried reaching out to some > > >> developers, but unfortunately don't find many people with capacity. > > >> > > >> Therefore, we are looking for developers who want to pick them up. > > >> > > >> Helps are needed on: > > >> > > >> - Introduce dedicated MetricsScope > > >> - Rework MetricGroup scope APIs > > >> - Remove MetricGroup methods accepting an int as a name > > >> - Remove brackets around variables > > >> - Drop MetricReporter#open > > >> - Gauge<T> should only take subclasses of Number, rather than > > >> everything > > >> - Add MetricGroup#getLogicalScope > > >> - User Java’s Duration instead of Flink’s Time > > >> - Review and refactor the REST API > > >> - Properly handle NaN/Infinity in OpenAPI spec > > >> - Enforce single maxExceptions query parameter > > >> - Drop Yarn specific get rest endpoints > > >> - Review and refactor the metrics implementation > > >> - Attach semantics to Gauges; refactor Counter / Meter to be Gauges > > >> with > > >> syntactic sugar on top > > >> - Restructure > > >> > > >> > > >> Please note that: > > >> > > >> - For some of the items, the milestones are already given, and > there > > >> might be some actions that need to be performed by Flink 1.19. > Please > > >> be > > >> aware that we are only 3.5 weeks from the 1.19 feature freeze. > > >> - There are also items which don't have any plans / milestones yet. > > For > > >> such items, we may want to quickly look into them to find out if > > >> there's > > >> anything that needs to be done in 1.19. > > >> - See more details on the 2.0 wiki page [1] > > >> > > >> > > >> If these items do not make Flink 1.19, we can discuss later what to do > > >> with > > >> them, either postpone release 2.0 or exclude them from this major > > release. > > >> But for now, let's first see what we can do by 1.19. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> > > >> Xintong > > >> > > >> > > >> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/2.0+Release > > >> > > > > > >
