Thank you everyone for voting！ The voting period has passed and we have enough binding votes!
Thus I will close the voting and summarize the result in another email. Best, Leonard > 2024年1月17日 下午5:54，Swapnal Varma <swapnal...@gmail.com> 写道： > > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Swapnal > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 1:57 AM Gunnar Morling > <gunnar.morl...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Best, >> >> --Gunnar >> >> >> Am Mo., 15. Jan. 2024 um 18:24 Uhr schrieb Fabian Hueske < >> fhue...@apache.org >>> : >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Cheers, Fabian >>> >>> >>> Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> schrieb am Mo., 15. Jan. 2024, 16:00: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Timo >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09.01.24 10:58, xiangyu feng wrote: >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Xiangyu Feng >>>>> >>>>> Danny Cranmer <dannycran...@apache.org> 于2024年1月9日周二 17:50写道： >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Danny >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 9:31 AM Feng Jin <jinfeng1...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Feng Jin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 5:29 PM Yuxin Tan <tanyuxinw...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Yuxin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com> 于2024年1月9日周二 17:25写道： >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 10:15 AM Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1(binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> Leonard >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2024年1月9日 下午5:08，Yangze Guo <karma...@gmail.com> 写道： >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>> Yangze Guo >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 5:06 PM Robert Metzger < >>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 9:54 AM Guowei Ma < >> guowei....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Guowei >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 4:49 PM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com >>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rui >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 4:41 PM Hang Ruan < >>>>>>> ruanhang1...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hang >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gongzhongqiang <gongzhongqi...@apache.org> 于2024年1月9日周二 >>>>>>> 16:25写道： >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 non-binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zhongqiang >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> 于2024年1月9日周二 15:05写道： >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Flink CDC >>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to Apache Flink. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current Flink CDC code, documentation, and website >> can >>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code: https://github.com/ververica/flink-cdc-connectors >> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/flink-cdc-connectors> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> docs: https://ververica.github.io/flink-cdc-connectors/ >> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ververica.github.io/flink-cdc-connectors/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink >> community >>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interested >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Flink CDC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding my original proposal[1] in the dev mailing >> list, >>>>>> I >>>>>>>>> firmly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this initiative aligns perfectly with Flink. For the >>>>>>> Flink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it represents an opportunity to bolster Flink's >> competitive >>>>>>>> edge >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> streaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data integration, fostering the robust growth and >>>>>> prosperity >>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecosystem. For the Flink CDC project, becoming a >>>>>> sub-project >>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means becoming an integral part of a neutral open-source >>>>>>>>> community, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capable of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attracting a more diverse pool of contributors. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All Flink CDC maintainers are dedicated to continuously >>>>>>>>>>>>> contributing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> achieve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seamless integration with Flink. Additionally, PMC >> members >>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Qingsheng, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I are willing to infacilitate the expansion of >>>>>>> contributors >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effectively maintain this new sub-project. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the >>>>>> Flink >>>>>>>>> bylaws >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at >> least >>>>>> 7 >>>>>>>> days >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Thursday January 18 >>>>>> 12:00 >>>>>>>>> UTC, >>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority. We will follow the >> instructions >>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bylaws >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the case of insufficient active binding voters: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Wait until the minimum length of the voting passes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Publicly reach out via personal email to the >> remaining >>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voters >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting mail thread for at least 2 attempts with at least >> 7 >>>>>>> days >>>>>>>>>>>>>> between >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two attempts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. If the binding voter being contacted still failed to >>>>>>>> respond >>>>>>>>>>>>>> after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the attempts, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the binding voter will be considered as inactive for the >>>>>>>> purpose >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular voting. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Welcome voting ! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leonard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/o7klnbsotmmql999bnwmdgo56b6kxx9l >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
