Hi Jeyhun, Thanks for your feedback. I agree the phrasing is a bit confusing, the main scope for FLIP-451 is limited to introducing timeout configuration and the new "ResultHandler" to Async Sink API. I will remove reference to FLIP-284 from the FLIP to disambiguate. Best Regards Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 17:59, Jeyhun Karimov <je.kari...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ahmed, > > Thanks a lot for the FLIP. +1 for it. > My main concern is that the boundary/scope of the two FLIPs (451 and 284) > and their differentiation/overlap is unclear for me from the FLIP document. > Could you please elaborate more on this? > > Regards, > Jeyhun > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:13 PM Ahmed Hamdy <hamdy10...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I would like to start a discussion on FLIP-451[1] > > The proposal comes on encountering a couple of issues while working with > > implementers for Async Sink. > > The FLIP mainly proposes a new API similar to AsyncFunction and > > ResultFuture as well as introducing timeout handling for AsyncSink > > requests. > > The FLIP targets 1.20 with backward compatible changes and we should > > proceed by adding support in all supporting connector repos. > > > > 1- > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-451%3A+Refactor+Async+Sink+API > > Best Regards > > Ahmed Hamdy > > >