Hi Jeyhun,
Thanks for your feedback. I agree the phrasing is a bit confusing, the main
scope for FLIP-451 is limited to introducing timeout configuration and the
new "ResultHandler" to Async Sink API.
I will remove reference to FLIP-284 from the FLIP to disambiguate.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy


On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 17:59, Jeyhun Karimov <je.kari...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ahmed,
>
> Thanks a lot for the FLIP. +1 for it.
> My main concern is that the boundary/scope of the two FLIPs (451 and 284)
> and their differentiation/overlap is unclear for me from the FLIP document.
> Could you please elaborate more on this?
>
> Regards,
> Jeyhun
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:13 PM Ahmed Hamdy <hamdy10...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I would like to start a discussion on FLIP-451[1]
> > The proposal comes on encountering a couple of issues while working with
> > implementers for Async Sink.
> > The FLIP mainly proposes a new API similar to AsyncFunction and
> > ResultFuture as well as introducing timeout handling for AsyncSink
> > requests.
> > The FLIP targets 1.20 with backward compatible changes and we should
> > proceed by adding support in all supporting connector repos.
> >
> > 1-
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-451%3A+Refactor+Async+Sink+API
> > Best Regards
> > Ahmed Hamdy
> >
>

Reply via email to