Thanks everyone for the verification and the votes.
The voting is now closed.

Best,
Alex

On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 13:51, Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - verified signatures
> - verified hashsums
> - built from source code with JDK 1.8 succeeded
> - checked Github release tag
> - checked release notes
> - reviewed the web PR
>
> Best,
> Leonard
>
> > 2025年2月7日 19:08,Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > 1. Verified the archives, checksums, and signatures
> > 2. Extracted and inspected the source code for binaries
> > 3. Built the source code
> > 4. Reviewed web PR and left one comment
> >
> > Best,
> > Rui
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 6:54 PM Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> - Reviewed release notes
> >> - Verified hashes, signatures, built from source
> >> - Verified release artifacts
> >> - Checked website PR
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Gyula
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:16 AM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Alex,
> >>>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>> I checked:
> >>> - Reviewed JIRA release notes
> >>> - Verify hashes and verify signatures
> >>> - Source code artifacts matching the current release
> >>> - Read the announcement blog and LGTM
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the pointers.
> >>>
> >>> 1. Yes this worked
> >>> 2. this did not work but I downloaded the KEYS file and imported it and
> >>> gpg --import < KEYS worked
> >>> I got this warning with the verification.
> >>> Warning gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> >>> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> >>> owner.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: Alexander Fedulov <alexander.fedu...@gmail.com>
> >>> Date: Wednesday, 5 February 2025 at 17:30
> >>> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> >>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1
> >>> Hi David,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for verifying the release.
> >>>
> >>> 1. sha256 and sha512 are not expected to be the same. Try
> >>> shasum -a 512 flink-1.20.1-bin-scala_2.12.tgz
> >>>
> >>> 2. I believe you do not have my public key imported. You can find it
> >>> in the project KEYS file (afedulov) [1]. Try
> >>> gpg --keyserver keys.openpgp.org --recv-key 8C1FC56D16B0029D
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Alex
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 15:03, David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Alex,
> >>>> Thanks for driving this release
> >>>>
> >>>> Checking the sha’s  as per
> >> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> >>> and see
> >>>>
> >>>>  *   shasum -a 256 flink-1.20.1-bin-scala_2.12.tgz
> >>>> 5fc4551cd11aee83a9569392339c43fb32a60847db456e1cb4fa64c8daae0186
> >>> flink-1.20.1-bin-scala_2.12.tgz
> >>>>
> >>>>  *
> >>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.20.1-rc1/flink-1.20.1-bin-scala_2.12.tgz.sha512
> >>>> is
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> c50105a095839c663074d6a242e72d0e27886f584e0d568a89e3cf84b87da2b5cf188e230f65890a4622192ddad49b347d57ea5fe1c3510d27484b64a4b4c415
> >>> flink-1.20.1-bin-scala_2.12.tgz
> >>>>
> >>>> I was expecting the long numbers to be the same.
> >>>>
> >>>> I was checking  the asc file and got
> >>>>
> >>>> gpg --verify flink-1.20.1-bin-scala_2.12.tgz.asc
> >>> flink-1.20.1-bin-scala_2.12.tgz
> >>>> gpg: Signature made Wed 29 Jan 00:08:19 2025 GMT
> >>>> gpg:                using RSA key
> >>> 5575E80D59BBB73C15A479B88C1FC56D16B0029D
> >>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> >>>>
> >>>> i.e. where appeared to be an error message.
> >>>>
> >>>> Am I missing something?
> >>>>   kind regards, David.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Alexander Fedulov <alexander.fedu...@gmail.com>
> >>>> Date: Wednesday, 29 January 2025 at 12:32
> >>>> To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> >>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] Release 1.20.1, release candidate #1
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> >>>> 1.20.1, as follows:
> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>>
> >>>> The staging area contains the following artifacts:
> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> >>>> to be deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> >>>> with fingerprint 8C1FC56D16B0029D [3],
> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >>>> * source code tag "release-1.20.1-rc1" [5],
> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
> >>>> blog post [6].
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> >>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Verification instruction can be found here [7] . You’re not required
> >>>> to verify everything, but please mention what you have tested along
> >>>> with your +/- vote.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12354994
> >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.20.1-rc1/
> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>> [4]
> >>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1783/org/apache/flink/
> >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.20.1-rc1
> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/772
> >>>> [7]
> >>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Verifying+a+Flink+Release
> >>>>
> >>>> Unless otherwise stated above:
> >>>>
> >>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited
> >>>> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> >>>> Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road,
> >>> Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
> >>>
> >>> Unless otherwise stated above:
> >>>
> >>> IBM United Kingdom Limited
> >>> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> >>> Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road,
> >>> Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
> >>>
> >>
>

Reply via email to