This has been merged now (both master and release-2.0). Thank you all for your feedback!
Gyula On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 3:41 AM Zakelly Lan <zakelly....@gmail.com> wrote: > Sry for the late reply, also +1 to have this in 2.0 given that we don't > guarantee backwards compatibility, and it is already not compatible in many > ways. Looking forward to this. > > > Best, > Zakelly > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 9:20 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thank you both for the efforts. The progress sounds great. > > > > JFYI, there are still a few other blocker issues, and based on the > progress > > of resolving them my estimation would be creating RC1 around next Friday. > > So for this feature there's no need to rush. Take your time for code > > reviewing and testing. > > > > As for the migration tool, I agree it's a bigger scope issue, and should > > not block the release. Actually, what I have in mind is something > > independent from any Flink version, and may serve for general > incompatible > > state migration. > > > > Best, > > > > Xintong > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 4:16 AM Kurt Ostfeld > <kurtostf...@proton.me.invalid > > > > > wrote: > > > > > A state migration tool that can migrate savepoints/checkpoints is a > great > > > idea that would be very useful for a lot of scenarios. But that is a > > bigger > > > scope issue. > > > > > > (fyi, CI is passing and PR should be fully ready) > > > > > >
