I agree a pre-commit hook for these linting checks, should be available and 
recommended in the developer documentation (I will put together a PR for this).

However, you can't enforce pre-commit hooks AFAIK so having something running 
in CI would still help.

Tom Cooper
@tomcooper.dev | https://tomcooper.dev


On Saturday, 29 March 2025 at 02:38, Neelesh Salian <neeleshssal...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> 
> +1 to the idea. I would suggest pre-commit hooks be a good alternative as
> they allow the developer to have more confidence before pushing the PR and
> waiting for CI/CD to pick it up. Thoughts?
> 
> Regards,
> Neelesh S. Salian
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 00:19 Ferenc Csaky ferenc.cs...@pm.me.invalid
> 
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tom,
> > 
> > Big +1 for this. On a slightly different note, do we know why the
> > CI run is still in beta? I see that it currently fails because of
> > Python problems, but AFAIK it was not really touched for quite some
> > time.
> > 
> > Is it just needs some more development time, or we have resource
> > limitations, maybe some ASF requirements to finalize its adoption
> > and make it "production ready"? IMO it would be a good thing to
> > wrap up this whole story. Furthermore, it runs for every commit, so
> > we also use twice as much resources for pretty much nothing at the
> > moment.
> > 
> > WDYT?
> > 
> > Best,
> > Ferenc
> > 
> > On Friday, March 28th, 2025 at 15:21, Arvid Heise
> > ahe...@confluent.io.INVALID wrote:
> > 
> > > +1, this will save time for everyone.
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 5:58 PM Tom Cooper c...@tomcooper.dev wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hey All,
> > > > 
> > > > I wanted to start a discussion on enabling linting checks, via a
> > > > GitHub Action, on all PRs in the main Flink repository.
> > > > 
> > > > Often when a user submits a PR they will wait for the CI to run in
> > > > Azure DevOps and this will fail as they have forgotten to run spotless 
> > > > or
> > > > checkstyle. However, in order to find this out, the author has to dig
> > > > through the Azure DevOps UI and often parse the logs.
> > > > 
> > > > We currently have a GitHub Action for running "pre-compile" checks
> > > > that include all the standard linting checks:
> > > > .github/workflows/template.pre-compile-checks.yml [1]. However this is 
> > > > only
> > > > run as part of the nightly (beta) runs.
> > > > 
> > > > We have discussed, in the CHI meetings, how it would be a better
> > > > experience for developers if this was run for every PR (using the 
> > > > default
> > > > JVM, currently 17). That way a clear indication would be given, via the
> > > > GitHub UI (green ticks and red crosses), if the PR has passed the basic
> > > > checks or not.
> > > > 
> > > > This would hopefully speed up the review process.
> > > > 
> > > > I have raised a JIRA for this [2] and, initially, this would probably
> > > > just consist of calling the pre-compile checks workflow as is from a top
> > > > level PR check workflow. We could then add any further checks we 
> > > > identify
> > > > in the future to that workflow.
> > > > 
> > > > Let me know what you think?
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > 
> > > > Tom Cooper
> > > > @tomcooper.dev | https://tomcooper.dev
> > > > 
> > > > [1]
> > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/.github/workflows/template.pre-compile-checks.yml
> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37534

Reply via email to