Hi Martijn, I have created a PR for updating the dependencies to the latest version at the time of the commits [1]. I've also opened another PR as a hotfix, as the license check CI currently doesn't actually check anything without and will always be green [2].
Best regards, Mate [1] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/153 [2] https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/154 On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 6:29 PM Mate Czagany <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > That's a great idea, I will look into it this week. > > Thank you, > Mate > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 5:10 PM Martijn Visser <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Mate, >> >> I would happily help out with driving the release, but I think we should >> check if there are other dependencies that could also use a bump, and do >> those too. Could you take a look at those? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Martijn >> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 8:50 AM Mate Czagany <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi! >> > >> > I would like to propose the release of flink-shaded 21.0, which would >> > upgrade Netty to a newer, 4.2.x version [1] that would also allow Flink >> to >> > move to a newer Pekko version. This also opens up the possibility to >> > release flink-shaded-netty-tcnative-static too, as the version of >> BoringSSL >> > this new Netty version uses is released under the Apache 2.0 license. >> [2] >> > >> > As I'm not a committer, I cannot drive the release myself, but I'll >> happily >> > take any tasks that I'm allowed to regarding the release. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Mate >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38320 >> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/t8p053nqft0v44rlsk9zpl507jq1hk3f >> > >> >
