+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the work on this Mika, it will make PTF development much easier and feels like a critical gap to close in the SDLC with stateful processing.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 5:07 AM Rion Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding). Thanks Mika! > > > On Mar 24, 2026, at 6:47 AM, Martijn Visser <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding). Thanks for driving this Mika > > > >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 11:07 AM Mika Naylor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hey all, > >> > >> I would like to start the vote to approve FLIP-567: Introduce a > >> ProcessTableFunction Test Harness [1]. > >> > >> The discussion thread [2] seems to have settled, and the proposal is > ready > >> for a formal vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will > >> close on Friday, March 20th. > >> > >> Warm regards, > >> Mika > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-567%3A+Introduce+a+ProcessTableFunction+Test+Harness > >> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/dnl5bws6fbhdfbwjcn3y6qmcy6lzt5jp >
