Hi Fabian,

In general a strong +1 for the feature, without getting into the details of
the FLIP yet. This is a missing feature for years and I'm happy that we're
putting the time to address this - while also getting rid of some of the
hard restrictions we had. Thanks!

Kind regards,
Gustavo

On Fri, 15 May 2026 at 16:39, Fabian Hueske <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion on FLIP-579: LATERAL SNAPSHOT Join [1].
>
> Enriching a stream with data from a (slowly changing) dynamic table is a
> super common use case.
> Flink SQL features Temporal Joins [2] to address these use cases.
> However, SQL users can only use the event-time variant which has many
> limitations (heavy dependency on frequent WM updates on both inputs,
> build-side table requires a PK, the join predicate must include the
> build-side PK, etc).
> The processing-time temporal join is disabled (due to build-side
> initialization issues [3]) and temporal table function joins are
> only available in Table API.
>
> FLIP-579 proposes a new temporal join operator that operates in
> processing-time and addresses the limitations of the existing
> implementations:
> * initialization of the build-side before joining
> * no requirement of continuous, frequent build-side WMs (after the
> initialization completed)
> * no requirement for a PK on the build-side
> * table function-based syntax [4] via a built-in SNAPSHOT function
> (proposed in FLIP-517 [4])
>
> Looking forward to your feedback.
>
> Best,
> Fabian
>
> [1]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-579%3A+LATERAL+SNAPSHOT+Join
> [2]
>
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-stable/docs/dev/table/sql/queries/joins/#temporal-joins
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19830
> [4]
>
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-stable/docs/dev/table/sql/queries/joins/#temporal-table-function-join
> [5]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-517%3A+Better+Handling+of+Dynamic+Table+Primitives+with+PTFs#FLIP517:BetterHandlingofDynamicTablePrimitiveswithPTFs-SNAPSHOTfortemporaljoins
>

Reply via email to