+1, thanks! Best, Ferenc
On Tuesday, June 2nd, 2026 at 16:54, Yuepeng Pan <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 . > Thanks for driving it. > > Best regards, > Yuepeng Pan > > Chanhae Oh <[email protected]> 于2026年6月2日周二 22:20写道： > > > Hi Sergey, > > This sounds reasonable to me. > > Since flink-ci-docker is a critical part of the Flink CI infrastructure, > > having it managed under Apache seems beneficial from a maintainability > > perspective. > > It should also make future work, such as JDK upgrades and CI environment > > changes, easier to coordinate across the community. > > Best, > > Chanhae Oh > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Sergey Nuyanzin <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 17:19 > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Move flink-ci-docker under Apache > > > > Hi everyone > > > > We use flink-ci-docker in Flink CI pipelines. > > The main issue is that each time we want to update it there are only a > > few or even a single person who can approve/merge it. > > It was under flink-ci[1], then[2] where most of Flink committers do > > not have access. > > > > The proposal is to move it under Apache in a similar way as it is done > > for flink-shaded/connectors. Then it will unblock activities like > > movements towards jdk25[3] and especially[4], where there is a need to > > add jdk25 to flink--ci-docker, I'd like to raise this > > > > [1] https://github.com/flink-ci/flink-ci-docker > > [2] https://github.com/zentol/flink-ci-docker > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37719 > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39739 > > -- > > Best regards, > > Sergey > > >
