Hi,

Thank you for the review.

I have started the voting thread for this FLIP:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/nv1103fg62dpqdzrn0g086qh57yyp96c

Best,
Dennis


On Wed, Jun 3, 2026 at 12:04 PM Gyula Fóra <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey Dennis!
>
> Thanks for this Flip, this is pretty confusing part of the autoscaler logic
> especially with the hardcoded logic.
>
> I agree with the new behaviour and proposed new defaults. Maybe one comment
> regarding the config keys.
> I think the old key:
> job.autoscaler.scaling.key-group.partitions.adjust.mode is pretty bad, in
> terms of naming/expressivity.
>
> Maybe this is a good chance to actually change the name to something like
>
> job.autoscaler.scaling.key-group-alignment.mode
> or
> job.autoscaler.scaling.key-group.parallelism-adjustment.mode
>
> In any case we should go head with this FLIP to the vote and we can agree
> on the config naming in the meantime.
>
> Gyula
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 2:36 PM Dennis-Mircea Ciupitu <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Bringing this thread back up after several weeks of quiet.
> >
> > The FLIP proposes composable alignment modes for the autoscaler so users
> > can opt into the strategy that fits their job rather than the single
> fixed
> > rule applied today (FLINK-32119 and FLINK-32120 are concrete instances of
> > the resulting friction). Full motivation, alternatives, and design
> details
> > are in the FLIP doc.
> >
> > Design doc:
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IbvKspt5jjjqiXl_CeHgI8EBn8LP-Pw0t7LqF85yFRw/edit?usp=sharing
> > Draft implementation:
> > https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/1088
> >
> > @Marton Balassi, @Gabor Somogyi, and @Peter Huang, based on your vote on
> > [1] & [2], I would really value your read here.
> > @Maximilian Michels, you opened FLINK-32119 and FLINK-32120, would value
> > your read on whether the composable-modes direction matches what you had
> in
> > mind when filing those.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dennis
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/zffx5r6fjkjldjjxr8oqtkwsobtwc6c3
> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/pkn8rmdfzfq5vl8smj8kw03jns9gq8ty
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 2:23 PM Dennis-Mircea Ciupitu <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback, I addressed them in the FLIP.
> > >
> > > Please have a look once again and let me know what you think.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Dennis
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 11:17 AM David Radley <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi there,
> > >> It would be useful in the motivation to explicitly describe  the value
> > of
> > >> the different options and the use cases that would drive the need for
> > each
> > >> of these permutations and all best practises.  Can the autoscaler work
> > out
> > >> automatically which of these to use?
> > >>     Kind regards, David.
> > >>
> > >> From: Dennis-Mircea Ciupitu <[email protected]>
> > >> Date: Wednesday, 15 April 2026 at 08:14
> > >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX: Composable Parallelism
> Alignment
> > >> Modes for Flink Autoscaler
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> [Sorry for reposting. I noticed the title in the previous message
> wasn’t
> > >> correct, so I’m sharing the updated version here.]
> > >>
> > >> I’d like to start a discussion on FLIP-XXX: Composable Parallelism
> > >> Alignment Modes for Flink Autoscaler [1].
> > >>
> > >> I’ve also opened a draft PR with a reference implementation to make
> the
> > >> proposal concrete and easier to review [2].
> > >>
> > >> Feedback and suggestions are very welcome.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Dennis
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IbvKspt5jjjqiXl_CeHgI8EBn8LP-Pw0t7LqF85yFRw/edit?usp=sharing
> > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/1088
> > >>
> > >> Unless otherwise stated above:
> > >>
> > >> IBM United Kingdom Limited
> > >> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> > >> Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road,
> > >> Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to