Hi Yuepeng
I think you need to cancel this RC to avoid confusions
since there is another RC4 is in voting

please correct me if I'm wrong

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 3:59 PM Gustavo de Morais
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Yuepeng, thanks for the reply.
>
> To rectify my vote:  +1 (non-binding). We need PMCs to cast binding votes
> for the release.
>
> Kind regards,
> Gustavo
>
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 at 17:31, Yuepeng Pan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi, team.
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply.
> > Thanks Sergey for pointing that out and developers involved in the voting
> > process.
> >
> > After incorporating Hao’s and David’s feedback on Nightly (beta),
> > I ran some tests and experiments on my own fork repo.
> > I have currently identified the following issues
> > that impact the correctness of the Nightly (beta) builds.
> > IIUC, we need to at least back-port the patches mentioned below to the
> > release-2.3
> > branch and ensure correct Nightly (beta) builds
> > before making a decision on the next RC build.
> >
> > I will also start driving these patches forward over the next couple of
> > days.
> >
> > Looking forward to more suggestions about Nightly (beta) issues.
> >
> > Related references:
> >
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39912
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39914
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37892
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39145
> >    -
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/edfeb3269146ed05476a405335e8af0cb8569482
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39823
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39858
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39884
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39901
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39902
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39903
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38534
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39917
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39918
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39919
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39920
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39921
> >    - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39922
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yuepeng Pan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sergey Nuyanzin <[email protected]> 于2026年6月9日周二 12:43写道:
> >
> > > I tend to think to vote with
> > > -1 (binding)
> > >
> > > the reason is that I tried to find at least one nightly run which is
> > > green for release 2.3 branch with one of the latest commits
> > > and I failed to do that...
> > > I think we need to have at least one, don't we?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 4:38 AM Xintong Song <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > - verified checksum and signature
> > > > - verified source distribution contains no binary
> > > > - verified build from source
> > > > - tried a few example jobs on a standalone cluster
> > > > - reviewed release announcement pr
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Xintong
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 12:14 AM Hao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >  +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > >   - Verified SHA512 checksums
> > > > >   - Verified GPG signatures
> > > > >   - Confirmed the source archive contains no binaries
> > > > >   - Built the source with Java 17
> > > > >   - Confirmed the source matches git tag release-2.3.0-rc3
> > > > >   - Ran an example job (TopSpeedWindowing) on the binary, and it
> > works
> > > > > as expected
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Hao
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2026 at 10:16 PM Yuepeng Pan <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bumping this thread. Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yuepeng Pan
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yuepeng Pan <[email protected]> 于2026年6月5日周五 08:00写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the
> > version
> > > > > > > 2.3.0, as follows:
> > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > > comments)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > > includes:
> > > > > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > > releases
> > > > > > > to be deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
> > > key
> > > > > > > with fingerprint B5B638DCA5F94E4A [3],
> > > > > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> > [4],
> > > > > > > * source code tag "release-2.3.0-rc3" [5],
> > > > > > > * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > > announcement
> > > > > > > blog post [6],
> > > > > > > * flink pull request adding release note for users [7].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > > majority
> > > > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Yuepeng Pan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12356392&projectId=12315522
> > > > > > > [2]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-2.3.0-rc3/
> > > > > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > > [4]
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1919
> > > > > > > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-2.3.0-rc3
> > > > > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/853
> > > > > > > [7] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/28123
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Sergey
> > >
> >



-- 
Best regards,
Sergey

Reply via email to