Thanks for taking another look and +1, Xuyang.
I'll leave the thread open a couple more days for any further comments, and
if there are no further concerns I'll start a VOTE.

Best,
Weiqing

On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 1:27 AM Xuyang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, Weiqing.
> Thanks for restarting this FLIP. Compared to the previous version, the
> overall approach looks largely unchanged. +1.
>
>
>
> --
>
>     Best!
>     Xuyang
>
>
>
> 在 2026-07-06 14:13:22,"Weiqing Yang" <[email protected]> 写道:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Gentle bump on this — I'd love another round of eyes before moving to a
> >vote.
> >
> >The proposal is the same as before at a high level; what's new is that the
> >design has been re-aligned with current master, and the implementation now
> >targets the latest master branch.
> >
> >@Xuyang, @Xingcan, @Becket — thank you for the thorough review last time.
> >Since you already know this proposal well, I'd really appreciate a quick
> >check that the points you raised still sit right in the current version.
> >
> >FLIP doc:
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YobpNdnvzSsceniVj4NZWi445gb1-54Rox-D7nPArZo/edit
> >
> >Feedback is very welcome!
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Weiqing
> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to