Hi everyone, While working across several Flink repositories, I noticed long gaps in development activity or outstanding upgrade work in some of them. Before preparing further changes or requesting reviews, I'd like to clarify their maintenance plans.
The repositories I have in mind are: - flink-jira-bot - flink-connector-rabbitmq - flink-connector-gcp-pubsub - flink-connector-prometheus - flink-training - flink-playgrounds - flink-ml Some related questions have already been raised: whether flink-training should be maintained or its documentation links changed [1], whether RabbitMQ remains supported [2], and finding a reviewer for the Pub/Sub source migration [3]. The inactivity of flink-ml also came up in the discussion about reducing CI usage [4]. I found these discussions, but may have missed later decisions or plans. A long gap between commits does not necessarily mean a repository is unused or should be retired. Could maintainers or others familiar with these repositories help clarify: 1. Are there existing plans or decisions to retire or archive any of them? 2. For those we intend to maintain, are there people available to review contributions, and any upgrade or release plans? Pointers to existing discussions or decisions would be very helpful. [1] Training repository maintenance question https://lists.apache.org/thread/w4984ldstwvj84nswgwknc6tmqkmwv1n [2] RabbitMQ support question https://lists.apache.org/thread/44rfg30cw75v0vw8vx38bl4yn6nd77ty [3] Pub/Sub reviewer request https://lists.apache.org/thread/c0mtft0x8zn01g55gz871flm79llsc45 [4] Flink ML and CI usage discussion https://lists.apache.org/thread/5dp2r2bhdqk5r2tvfz8htrjl0ozjqkl3 -- Kind regards, Aleksandr
