On 16 Jul 2014, at 17:04, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > The initial recommendation for a user@ list was to wait and see the amount > of mails on the dev@ list. > > I personally think that the traffic on dev@ is pretty high. Tez for example > had between January and May less than 100 messages, but they have a user@ > list. > Similarly BatchEE is also below 100 for months and they have a user@ list. > > We are already at 250 messages in the middle of the month, so I vote for > requesting a user@ list. +1
