+1 Sounds good to me.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > sorry, my previous message was confusing. I suggest to release a new Flink > version all 3 months. > BUT, the 0.7-incubating release is going to be feature freeze in 3 weeks > because 0.6-incubating was more about getting the release infra set up and > the apache rename out. > The last release that contained a lot of features was 0.5 and it was > released on May 29. So aiming for end of September for the next feature > release should be somehow in the schedule. > > > Robert > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Ufuk Celebi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey Robert, > > > > +1 to frequent regular frequent major releases (I guess you meant 3 weeks > > and not 3 months, right?). > > > > Ufuk > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I agree with Fabian that the list of features is a lot of work. I would > > > prefer to have frequent regular major releases (say 3 months schedule). > > > This way, users can quickly access the latest features and we don't > force > > > them to use SNAPSHOT versions. > > > Also, releases draw attention to our project. > > > > > > I would suggest to do a feature freeze on September 24 (3 weeks from > now) > > > and start the vote a few days afterwards. I assume that at least some > of > > > the suggested 7 features of the release are ready. > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Fabian Hueske <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I agree that these should be features to add soon, but I'm a bit > > doubtful > > > > that we will have the next release in 5 weeks if we want to include > all > > > of > > > > this. > > > > > > > > I think we should either have a feature- or time-oriented release > plan. > > > > If we want to have a fixed release date, we could make a feature > stop 1 > > > > week (or so) in advance, include what's in until then and continue to > > > > release every n weeks. > > > > Or we make a list of what should be in the next release and try to > > give a > > > > reasonable time estimate for that (which didn't work out so well in > the > > > > past.... ;-) ) > > > > > > > > But having both, a close deadline and a long list of complex features > > > will > > > > not work out well, IMO. > > > > > > > > Just my 2 cents, Fabian > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-08-27 19:49 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > This is a nice list. > > > > > > > > > > I would like to add: > > > > > > > > > > - Rework JobManager internals to support incremental program > > rollout & > > > > > execution > > > > > - First parts of dynamic memory assignments > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Robert Metzger < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > since we have our release infrastructure in place now, I would > > > suggest > > > > to > > > > > > aim for a 0.7-incubating release in the near future (say 3-5 > > weeks). > > > > > > While 0.6-incubating was mainly about getting the release infra / > > > legal > > > > > > stuff sorted out, I think it would be nice to have a "feature" > > > release > > > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > The following new features would make a great 0.7-incubating > > release: > > > > > > - *Flink Streaming* "Beta Preview". I would suggest to ship the > > > > > streaming, > > > > > > but clearly mark it as a preview in the documentation. > > > > > > -* Java API Pojo improvements*: Code generation, key selection > > > using a > > > > > > string-expression: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1032 > > > > > > - *Reworked Scala API*. Bring the Scala API in sync with the > > latest > > > > > > developments in the Java API: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-641 > > > > > > -* Akka-based RPC service*: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1019 > > > > > > - *Kryo-based serialization*. This feature has been requested > by > > > many > > > > > > users. Mostly because they wanted to use Collections inside > POJOs: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-610 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Opinions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
