Yes, I also wanted to do that. :D
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Márton Balassi <[email protected]> wrote: > During the Scala API rewrite thread a minor naming issue popped up: > > The scala examples are located at the org.apache.flink.examples.scala > package, while the java ones in the org.apache.flink.example.java. (Both > are located in the flink-examples project) > > Kostas agreed that a single convention should be desirable (to rule them > all :)) and voted for examples. > > Well, the one to rule them all approach will not work: > > - Spargel and streaming have their own examples subpackages, > org.apache.flink.{spargel.java, streaming}.examples. As these are in the > respective projects this is fine. > - flink-jdbc, flink-avro, flink-hbase contain example packages, but all > of them actually contain single examples. As these do not require > additional examples and are currently active parts of the repo I would not > touch them. > - Flink-hadoop-compatibility contains 4 different packages containing > examples. The 4 packages logically refer to different Hadoop API-s. Each > one is named <api_name>.example. This can also stay as it is or can be > extracted to a common examples package. > > Personally I would only change the org.apache.flink.example.java package to > org.apache.flink.examples.java. If there are no objections I'm renaming the > package on Aljoscha's scala-rework branch which is soon to be merged to the > main repo and contains considerable update on the flink-examples project. > > Cheers, > > Marton
