Will this conflict with Marton's restructuring proposal which happens in another thread (see "Project restructure" thread in the dev@ list).
Since we are doing refactoring, may I suggest that we also remove "flink-" prefix since maven group name will indicate it is part of Flink. - Henry On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I think that by now, quite a bit of the maven project structure can be > improved to get rid of some legacy artifacts. Especially the "flink-addons" > project seems to be a catch-all place for various projects. > > Here is a suggestion what we could do: > > 1) Move "flink-yarn" to the root. > > 2) Move "flink-streaming" to the root (this is planned anyways for the next > release) > > 3) Create a project "flink-connectors", which will contain "avro", "jdbc", > and "hbase". Should we have them as separate sub-projects, or as one > project? > > 4) Consolidate the examples into a single project "flink-examples", where > Java, Scala, Streaming examples exist in different packages. > > > Greetings, > Stephan
