[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13432057#comment-13432057
 ] 

Hari Shreedharan commented on FLUME-1452:
-----------------------------------------

Denny - This is built into the architecture. The source need not know about the 
sink at all. The channel is a buffer to store the events. It is entirely 
possible to connect a sink to that channel later to retrieve the events from 
that. I don't think there is anything wrong with the current set up. We can 
have channels with either a source or a sink or both, but every channel must 
have at least one - the idea being that you either buffer event in the channel 
or drain events from it or do both.
                
> Source should not submit event to Sink which it doesnot connect to any Sink
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLUME-1452
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1452
>             Project: Flume
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Configuration
>    Affects Versions: v1.2.0
>            Reporter: Denny Ye
>            Assignee: Denny Ye
>              Labels: Sink
>             Fix For: v1.3.0
>
>
> If there has Channel (mc) and it does not connect to any Sink, Source 
> shouldn't submit event to it.
> Configuration example:
> {quote}
> #Channels that Source connect to
> agent.sources.scribesource.channels = mc
> #No specified Sink connect to this Channel
> {quote}
> Otherwise, event in this Channel is increasing and no consumer, it's 
> misunderstanding.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to