> On Nov. 15, 2012, 1:53 a.m., Juhani Connolly wrote: > > Hi Hari, you just posted a sqoop issue to the flume group to review? Was > > this your intention... I had a glance at the original issue but it didn't > > look related to flume?
Sorry, old habits die hard! ;) It was not intended for Flume, but for Sqoop! Sorry for the spam! - Hari ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8063/#review13456 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 15, 2012, 1:12 a.m., Hari Shreedharan wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/8063/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 15, 2012, 1:12 a.m.) > > > Review request for Flume. > > > Description > ------- > > Improved thread handling in SqoopOutputFormatLoadExecutor. Removed the > synchronized blocks and wait/notify. > > > This addresses bug SQOOP-690. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-690 > > > Diffs > ----- > > execution/mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/job/io/Data.java f6fff0b > > execution/mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/job/mr/SqoopOutputFormatLoadExecutor.java > 0d636ae > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8063/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Ran unit tests, and on a real cluster. > > > Thanks, > > Hari Shreedharan > >
