> On Dec. 7, 2012, 8:30 p.m., Brock Noland wrote:
> > flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/AbstractChannelSelector.java,
> >  line 73
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/8413/diff/5/?file=235844#file235844line73>
> >
> >     The method that was deleted channels being null. That should be handled 
> > here as well, correct?
> >     
> >     I am seeing the following tests failures:
> >     
> >     Tests in error: 
> >       
> > testNoDefault(org.apache.flume.channel.TestMultiplexingChannelSelector)
> >      
> > testOnlyOptional(org.apache.flume.channel.TestMultiplexingChannelSelector)

Ah sorry. Since the 2 patches affected the same code, looks like some code 
ended up missing.


- Hari


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8413/#review14181
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 7, 2012, 8:05 p.m., Hari Shreedharan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8413/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 7, 2012, 8:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Flume.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Replicating channel selector should support optional channels
> 
> 
> This addresses bug FLUME-1769.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1769
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/AbstractChannelSelector.java
>  939257d 
>   
> flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/MultiplexingChannelSelector.java
>  54e4b20 
>   
> flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/ReplicatingChannelSelector.java
>  8f22746 
>   
> flume-ng-core/src/test/java/org/apache/flume/channel/TestReplicatingChannelSelector.java
>  e671364 
>   flume-ng-doc/sphinx/FlumeUserGuide.rst 70cb285 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8413/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added unit tests to handle this case
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hari Shreedharan
> 
>

Reply via email to