> On Nov. 5, 2013, 8 p.m., Roshan Naik wrote: > > Hari, were you able to take any measurements on how much perf improvement > > this change made ?
No, not really. I really did not hit this issue myself - we had a customer run into this issue when they were running with 0 keep-alive. - Hari ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15239/#review28209 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 5, 2013, 7:42 p.m., Hari Shreedharan wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/15239/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 5, 2013, 7:42 p.m.) > > > Review request for Flume. > > > Bugs: FLUME-2233 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2233 > > > Repository: flume-git > > > Description > ------- > > Added a fix for this issue using an additional parameter, which can be used > to disable memory checks. > > > Diffs > ----- > > flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/MemoryChannel.java > 688323d > flume-ng-doc/sphinx/FlumeUserGuide.rst 3a3038c > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15239/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > All current tests pass. > > > Thanks, > > Hari Shreedharan > >
