On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Hari Shreedharan
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually the Java 7 thing is just so that we can finally use Java 7 API. So
> moving to 8 and then targeting 7 would work fine I think.
>
> So when I meant release volunteering is that the volunteer would do the
> release, and I can push the bits out.

Got it :)

Can you please look this jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2589
This page would be very valuable for Flume User's.

>
> On Thursday, February 12, 2015, Ashish <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Java 7 shall be EOLed in April 2015. Any issues in moving directly to
>> 1.8 (perhaps generate target binary with 1.7 version if needed)? Just
>> a wild thought :) Perhaps after migration we can move to 2.0 and do
>> some breaking changes as well :)
>>
>> I am not sure but don't think anyone other than committer can do a
>> release, else he won't be able to push generated stuff and website
>>
>> Johny would be able to release faster than me, believe he is co-located.
>>
>> thanks
>> ashish
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > Yep, to be clear - Flume 1.6 will still have to be Java 6, since we
>> added a bunch of features which never got shipped for Java 6. So we will
>> switch to Java 7 only after the 1.6 release
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks, Hari
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Johny Rufus <[email protected]
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Hari,
>> >> I am interested in doing the release management for 1.6.
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Rufus
>> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Hari Shreedharan <
>> >> [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >>> Hi fellow devs,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hadoop just released 2.6 which is their last release on Java 6. Since
>> Java
>> >>> 6 was EOL-ed a long time ago, we should think about doing that in
>> Flume as
>> >>> well. To make sure we have all the recent features committed available
>> for
>> >>> users of Java 6, we should do that only once 1.6 is released. So in
>> this
>> >>> email, I want to propose two things:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Release 1.6 as soon as possible. Any one from the community who is
>> >>> interested in doing the release management for this release, please
>> let me
>> >>> know. I will gladly mentor you :-)
>> >>> 2. Post 1.6, drop Java 6 support - so things like Java 7-only
>> >>> DirectoryWatcher API can be used for things like SpoolDir or a Tail
>> Source.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Let me know if anyone disagrees with blocking Java 6.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks, Hari
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> thanks
>> ashish
>>
>> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
>> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>>



-- 
thanks
ashish

Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal

Reply via email to