I don’t think that gives us any benefits. The reason dropping Hadoop-1 helps is that it greatly reduces the amount of reflection we use and can simplify quite a lot of our codebase. Remove hbase-94 does not give us any of those benefits - it will remove a profile from our pom, but we don’t really use that much in our official builds anyway.
Thanks, Hari Shreedharan > On May 13, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Johny Rufus <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for dropping hadoop-1, > > Should we also consider dropping the hbase-94 compatible profile ? > > Thanks, > Rufus > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:08 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> ________________________________________________ >> Jean-François Guilmard >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Needham, Guy [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: mercredi 13 mai 2015 16:00 >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support >> >> +1 >> >> Regards, >> >> Guy Needham | Data Discovery >> Virgin Media | Technology and Transformation | Data >> Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UP D 01256 75 3362 I >> welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/ >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jarek Jarcec Cecho [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jarek >> Jarcec Cecho >> Sent: 13 May 2015 13:20 >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support >> >> +1 >> >> I believe that dropping Hadoop 1 support is completely fair at this point. >> Hadoop 2 is stable for a long time and offers much better capabilities. >> People who remain on Hadoop 1 will still have ability to download older >> Flume releases that are Hadoop 1 compatible. >> >> Jarcec >> >>> On May 13, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Hari Shreedharan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Adding user@ >>> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple) >>>> >>>> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected >>>> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Flume devs, >>>>> >>>>> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to >>>>> start a >>>> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I >>>> am not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7 >>>> as the minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a >>>> good idea to drop Hadoop 1 support at this point. >>>>> >>>>> Comments? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Hari Shreedharan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> thanks >>>> ashish >>>> >>>> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: >>>> http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal >>>> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail? >> >> Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun. >> >> This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally >> privileged and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If >> you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system: >> its use, disclosure or copying is unauthorised. Statements and opinions >> expressed in this email may not represent those of Virgin Media. Any >> representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract. >> >> Registered office: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, >> Hampshire, RG27 9UP Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237 >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain >> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have >> received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the >> original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed >> by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, >> including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned >> by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of >> internal compliance with Accenture policy. >> >> ______________________________________________________________________________________ >> >> www.accenture.com >>
