On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Denes Arvay <[email protected]> wrote:
> What are your plans regarding to the mentioned 18 issues in patch available > state? Should we decide on a one-by-one basis whether we'd like to include > in the release or should we reschedule all of them to a next release? > I'd personally recommend committing whatever is ready and reasonably low-risk, and whatever doesn't make the deadline should "miss the train" unless it's a particularly critical issue. This approach has worked well for me in the past. Best, Mike
