On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I figured it would be prudent to start a thread on this. > > The more I re-read http://fluo.incubator.apache.org/related-projects/, the > more confused I am on the state of things. > > While I do know that the original Incubation proposal only included the > "core" and "recipes" pieces, I don't think I realized that scope of how many > parallel projects existed in the github.com/fluo-io umbrella. Why have so > many of these been left in the github org instead of following into the ASF? > > To paraphrase from the general@incubator VOTE's, separate communities are > indeed allowed and fine for Fluo. The most clear point I can probably bring > is that the community members are likely 1:1 across the PPMC and the fluo-io > on Github (please tell me if I'm wrong). If I had to guess, this is what > sent up red flags to the other IPMC members. > > Why would you want to keep something like fluo-quickstart completely > separated from the Apache Fluo community? I would think a project like that > would be *extremely* useful in helping to attract new users and developers > to Fluo.
For me, part of it is that things can be much more fluid outside of Apache. For example I Am working on Fluo Tour for the website that walks a user step by step through all of Fluo's features. I am thinking of renaming fluo-quickstart to fluo-tour for this and having the website point to it. Based on past experience these simple things are not easy in Apache. However may be we can plan for the lack of fluidity and create one github repo for example code called fluo-examples in Apache land. Then place all example code the website links to there under separate directories. > > Would love to hear what you all think. > > - Josh
