Hi Liebing, Thanks for the clarification. >1. To clarify, the data is currently split by partition level for partitioned tables and by table for non-partitioned tables.
Therefore the main aim of this FIP is improving the speed of read data from different partitions, store data speed may still limit for a single system? Best, Zhe Wang Liebing Yu <[email protected]> 于2026年1月13日周二 19:11写道： > Hi Zhe, Thanks for the questions! > > 1. To clarify, the data is currently split by partition level for > partitioned tables and by table for non-partitioned tables. > > 2. Regarding RemoteStorageCleaner, you are absolutely right. Supporting > remote.data.dirs there is necessary for a complete cleanup when a table is > dropped. > > Thanks for pointing that out! > > Best regards, > Liebing Yu > > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 at 17:02, Zhe Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Liebing, > > > > Thanks for driving this, I think it's a really useful feature. > > I have two small questions: > > 1. What's the scope for split data in dirs, I see there's a partitionId > in > > ZK Data, so the data will spit by partition in different directories, or > by > > bucket? > > 2. Maybe it needs to support remote.data.dirs in RemoteStorageCleaner? So > > we can delete all remoteStorage when delete table. > > > > Best, > > Zhe Wang > > > > Liebing Yu <[email protected]> 于2026年1月8日周四 20:10写道： > > > > > Hi devs, > > > > > > I propose initiating discussion on FIP-25[1]. Fluss leverages remote > > > storage systems—such as Amazon S3, HDFS, and Alibaba Cloud OSS—to > > deliver a > > > cost-efficient, highly available, and fault-tolerant storage solution > > > compared to local disk. *However, in production environments, we often > > find > > > that the bandwidth of a single remote storage becomes a bottleneck. > > *Taking > > > OSS[2] as an example, the typical upload bandwidth limit for a single > > > account is 20 Gbit/s (Internal) and 10 Gbit/s (Public). So I initiated > > this > > > FIP which aims to introduce support for multiple remote storage paths > and > > > enables the dynamic addition of new storage paths without service > > > interruption. > > > > > > Any feedback and suggestions on this proposal are welcome! > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUSS/FIP-25%3A+Support+Multi-Location+for+Remote+Storage > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/oss/user-guide/limits?spm=a2c63.l28256.help-menu-31815.d_0_0_5.2ac34d06oZYFvK > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Liebing Yu > > > > > >
