Those are quite interesting topics as well!
I would also like to focus attention on data encryption, starting with TLS
support for tablet/coordinator communication and client communication.
I will directly comment on the github discussion.

On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 12:34 PM Liebing Yu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jark,
>
> Thanks for laying out such a great vision. Regarding production stability
> and maintainability, I have a few considerations:
>
> 1. Multi-disk Support
> I’m not certain if KV clusters can transition directly from local disks to
> cloud-native "zero-disks" as log clusters do. The evolution path might
> likely be: single local disk -> multiple local disks -> zero-disk. For KV
> clusters, do we need to support multiple local disks to reduce costs before
> fully realizing the zero-disk architecture?
>
> 2. Physical Isolation at DB/Table Level
> This is another critical requirement for KV in production. Unlike log
> workloads, KV use cases are highly diverse, necessitating physical-level
> isolation to prevent cross-business interference (the "noisy neighbor"
> effect).
>
> 3. Rate Limiting
> We should support traffic throttling/rate limiting at both the database and
> table levels.
>
> Best regards,
> Liebing Yu
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 at 15:54, Jark Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > As we step into 2026, I’d like to kick off a collaborative discussion
> > around the Fluss Roadmap for 2026 to align our community efforts, set
> > clear priorities, and ensure Fluss continues to evolve in a direction
> > that best serves real-world use cases, especially in streaming,
> > lakehouse, and AI workloads.
> >
> > I’ve drafted an initial set of themes and focus areas based on recent
> > contributions and user feedback:
> >
> > 👉 https://github.com/apache/fluss/discussions/2342
> >
> > If you are running Fluss in production or evaluating it for your
> > next-gen architecture, your feedback is critical. It's very welcome to
> > comment here or in the GitHub Discussion thread about:
> >
> > * Blockers: What is missing that prevents you from deploying Fluss today?
> > * Priorities: Which feature below would provide the most immediate
> > value to your team?
> > * AI & Lakehouse: Which specific integration do you expect the most?
> >
> >
> > Side note: Once the 2026 roadmap is finalized, I suggest replacing the
> > current roadmap page on the website (https://fluss.apache.org/roadmap)
> > with this version by linking to the GitHub discussion link. This makes
> > it easier to maintain and keep up to date, as it stays naturally
> > synchronized with actual GitHub development progress.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Jark Wu
> >
>


-- 
Lorenzo Affetti
Senior Software Engineer @ Flink Team
Ververica <http://www.ververica.com>

Reply via email to