+1 for the proposal.

I am also considering renaming the fluss-rust repository to
fluss-clients to better reflect its current scope. Looking ahead,
Fluss will likely require a single-binary CLI built on the Rust SDK,
and the fluss-clients repository would be the ideal location for this
CLI module.

Best,
Jark

On Mon, 2 Mar 2026 at 22:38, yuxia <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Keith for driving it.
> I'm +1 to use clients.fluss.apache.org since it's not just for rust client, 
> but also for cpp, python and more other languages in the future. And since 
> clients.fluss.apache.org also
> link to the java client. It's reasonable to me to use 
> clients.fluss.apache.org.
>
> Best regards,
> Yuxia
>
> ----- 原始邮件 -----
> 发件人: "ForwardXu" <[email protected]>
> 收件人: "dev" <[email protected]>
> 发送时间: 星期一, 2026年 3 月 02日 下午 8:39:55
> 主题: [SPAM]Re:Setting up domain name for fluss-rust documentation
>
> Hi Keith,
> Thanks for driving this initiative.
> I fully support the proposal to host fluss-rust documentation on 
> clients.fluss.apache.org. As fluss-rust continues to evolve and accumulate 
> more features, it becomes increasingly necessary to establish a dedicated, 
> independent website for its documentation. This will significantly improve 
> discoverability, organization, and user experience for developers working 
> with the Rust client, separating it cleanly from the core project materials.
> Looking forward to seeing this progress.
> Best regards,
> ForwardXu
>          原始邮件
>
>
> 发件人:Keith Lee <[email protected]&gt;
> 发件时间:2026年3月2日 17:10
> 收件人:dev <[email protected]&gt;
> 主题:Setting up domain name for fluss-rust documentation
>
>
>
>        Hello&nbsp;dev,&nbsp;PMCs,
>
> I&nbsp;am&nbsp;working&nbsp;towards&nbsp;setting&nbsp;up&nbsp;fluss-rust&nbsp;documentation&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;hosted&nbsp;on
> the&nbsp;proposed&nbsp;domain&nbsp;name&nbsp;`clients.fluss.apache.org`&nbsp;[1][2].&nbsp;This&nbsp;email
> seeks&nbsp;to&nbsp;gather&nbsp;feedback&nbsp;(if&nbsp;any)&nbsp;and&nbsp;get&nbsp;approval&nbsp;from&nbsp;at&nbsp;least&nbsp;1&nbsp;PMC,&nbsp;so
> that&nbsp;I&nbsp;can&nbsp;use&nbsp;this&nbsp;thread&nbsp;as&nbsp;reference&nbsp;to&nbsp;PMC&nbsp;approval&nbsp;which&nbsp;ASF&nbsp;Infra
> will&nbsp;need.
>
> Ref
> [1]&nbsp;https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/issues/413
> [2]&nbsp;https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/issues/356#issuecomment-3981656802
>
> Best&nbsp;regards
> Keith&nbsp;Lee

Reply via email to