Thanks for addressing my comments in the discussion thread. +1 (binding)
Best, Jark On Fri, 27 Mar 2026 at 16:34, Lorenzo Affetti via dev <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 non-binding > > Apologies, my concerns were clarified. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 9:55 AM Lorenzo Affetti < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > -1 non-binding > > > > I raised my concerns on the discussion thread. > > I think 2 directions worth exploring/documenting (paginated requests with > > snapshot ID, and true streaming RPC), should be evaluated extensively > > before opting for this design. > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 7:16 AM Nicholas Jiang <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> +1. > >> > >> Warm Regards, > >> Nicholas Jiang > >> > >> On 2026/03/24 18:04:54 Giannis Polyzos wrote: > >> > Hi devs, > >> > I'd like to start a vote on FIP-17 Support Full KV Scan for Primary Key > >> > Tables [1]. > >> > > >> > You can find the discussion on it in [2]. > >> > This vote will last for at least 72 hours, unless there are objections > >> or > >> > insufficient votes. > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > Giannis > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUSS/FIP-17+Support+Full+KV+Scan+for+Primary+Key+Tables > >> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/nx8tq85o7rxsp7m0oy7s30cmn1mrkg4j > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > Lorenzo Affetti > > Senior Software Engineer @ Flink Team > > Ververica <http://www.ververica.com> > > > > > -- > Lorenzo Affetti > Senior Software Engineer @ Flink Team > Ververica <http://www.ververica.com>
