+1 (non-binding) Cheers, well done
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 11:16 PM Keith Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best regards, > Keith > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2026 at 16:53, Jark Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Best, > > Jark > > > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 at 15:37, Michael Koepf <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > -- > > > Best, > > > MKO > > > > > > > > > > On 27.04.2026, at 08:43, Giannis Polyzos <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > Looking forward to this. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Giannis > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 9:42 AM Prajwal Banakar < > > [email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi everyone, > > > >> > > > >> Following the [DISCUSS] thread for FIP-37 and incorporating feedback > > from > > > >> Keith Lee, Giannis Polyzos, Jark Wu, and Yang Wang, I would like to > > > >> formally start the vote on FIP-37: Native RoaringBitmap Integration > > for > > > >> Apache Fluss. > > > >> > > > >> The revised FIP introduces nine RoaringBitmap SQL functions (Phase > 1) > > and > > > >> three additional functions (Phase 2) registered via FlussCatalog on > > BYTES > > > >> columns. The native BITMAP type and server-side pushdown are > deferred > > to > > > >> future FIPs. > > > >> > > > >> FIP wiki: > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUSS/FIP-37%3A+Native+RoaringBitmap+Integration+for+Apache+Fluss > > > >> > > > >> Discussion thread: > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/z9dwyg81cs3bt7yssb4n3vg17o767r5s > > > >> > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Accept the proposal > > > >> [ ] +0 No opinion > > > >> [ ] -1 Reject the proposal (please provide reasoning) > > > >> > > > >> Best regards, > > > >> Prajwal Banakar > > > >> > > > -- Lorenzo Affetti Senior Software Engineer @ Flink Team Ververica <http://www.ververica.com>
