Hi Leonard, Thanks for the correction - you are right. To clarify my vote: +1 (binding)
-- Anton ср, 27 мая 2026 г. в 03:05, Jark Wu <[email protected]>: > > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Jark > > On Wed, 27 May 2026 at 09:58, Leonard Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks hongshun for driving this FLIP, this API is very useful for Flink > > CDC user case eg sync all tables of given Fluss database to downstream > > datalake. > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > @Anton，hint: committer’s vote for FIP is binding. > > > > > > Best, > > Leonard > > > > > 2026 5月 27 08:46，Anton Borisov <[email protected]> 写道： > > > > > > Hi Hongshun, > > > The design is in good shape and addresses a real gap for whole-database > > > CDC. > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > One small correction: the "Discussion thread" link in your vote mail > > > points to the FIP-3 (Iceberg tiering) thread, not FIP-43. > > > The correct FIP-43 discussion thread is: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/dhscd0tct8lz3p9vdpty3o7l1rw3dr7j > > > > > > -- Anton > > > > > > вт, 26 мая 2026 г. в 09:30, Hongshun Wang <[email protected]>: > > >> > > >> Hi devs, > > >> I would like to start a vote on FIP-43: Fluss Multi-Table Subscription > > >> API. > > >> > > >> Discussion thread: > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hvcxvt5zgk7k38jf3v67mrzvrhsn25o7 > > >> > > >> Proposal: > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUSS/FIP-43++Fluss+Multi-Table+Subscription+API > > >> > > >> This vote will last for at least 72 hours, unless there are objections or > > >> insufficient votes. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Hongshun > >
