Thanks for the heads-up.
One follow-up: now that `fluss-rust` is part of the main repo, should we also 
standardize the issue/PR conventions for Rust-related work?
For example:
- Issues: use a `[rust]` title prefix and a `component: rust` label?
- PRs: use `[rust]` as the title prefix, e.g. `[rust] Fix client build against 
updated proto`


Best regards,
Yuxia

----- 原始邮件 -----
发件人: "Nicholas" <[email protected]>
收件人: "dev" <[email protected]>
发送时间: 星期日, 2026年 7 月 05日 上午 9:48:29
主题: Re:[ANNOUNCE] The Rust, Python, C++ and Elixir clients are now part of 
Apache Fluss(Incubating)

Thanks Anton for driving this. Great work!


Regards,
Nicholas Jiang

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anton Borisov" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 4 Jul 2026 13:58:36 +0100
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The Rust, Python, C++ and Elixir clients are now part of 
Apache Fluss(Incubating)

The fluss-rust repo (and its Rust/Python/C++/Elixir clients) now lives
in the main repo under fluss-rust, landed via a history-preserving
merge: every original commit and author is intact, and git log/blame
work on fluss-rust files.

A few things worth knowing:
 - Your next git pull brings in fluss-rust/ plus ~320 imported
commits, a larger-than-usual one-time fetch.
- The Rust CI is path-gated (fluss-rust/** + proto), so Java-only PRs
are unaffected.
- fluss-rust now builds against fluss-rpc/.../FlussApi.proto, so a
proto change can trip the Rust build, the rust CI lane will tell you.
 - apache/fluss-rust will be archived, please move any open PRs there
over to apache/fluss under fluss-rust.

Thanks to everyone who reviewed, and to the fluss-rust contributors
whose history came along with it.

-- Anton

Reply via email to