Thanks junbo, The proposal looks good to me in general. +1
Best, Foward Junbo Wang <[email protected]> 于2026年7月30日周四 11:49写道： > Hi all, I'd like to start a discussion on FIP-49: Fluss Gateway REST API. > > The proposal is available here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/FLUSS/pages/444334561/FIP-49+Fluss+Gateway+REST+API > > This FIP is an extension of FIP-32 (Multiprotocol Query Gateway) [1] and > does not conflict with it. Following the earlier suggestion to split the > gateway work into focused FIPs, FIP-49 defines the REST write path and DDL > / metadata management in detail, while REST read and the SQL path remain in > the scope of FIP-32. > > In short, it proposes a standalone, stateless fluss-gateway process (Rust, > axum + tokio, built on fluss-rust) providing: > > HTTP/JSON ingestion into KV and Log tables, at-least-once, with per-row > success/failure reporting > Full database / table / partition DDL > Pluggable client authentication, and a service / user (act-as) identity > mode towards Fluss > Multi-cluster routing, Prometheus metrics, a unified error model > > No Fluss server-side changes are required— the gateway accesses existing > clusters purely as a fluss-rust client. > > Looking forward to your feedback and suggestions. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/sf0qfxhr9j2g0dtxvp586p9zknxvpx6x > > > Best regards, > Junbo Wang > >
