Ross Gardler wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > >We need to be continually cleaning up our Jira issue tracker. > >There is a lot of clutter and it means that we cannot have a > >good view of our situation. > > > >We recently defined a stack categories. That helps to provide > >other ways to browse the outstanding issues. > > > >Today i removed the 0.6.1 release version. That helps with the > >Roadmap because now we can see the 0.8 issues too. > > > >That Roadmap shows a stack of issues marked as occuring against > >HEAD version and then another stack against 0.7 version. > > > >Should all the 0.7 ones be moved to HEAD, or the other way around, > >should all HEAD issues be moved to 0.7 version? > > > >I reckon the latter, move HEAD to 0.7 version. Then we should > >remove "HEAD version" as an option in Jira. > > > >What do others reckon? > > +1 - this seems to have the most meaning when we have 0.7 out the door. > Perhaps this should be part of the release process. Everything marked as > head during the code freeze should be moved to the upcoming release.
Yeah that is what i did last release. What i am proposing now is an extra step. Remove the option "HEAD version" entirely from Jira. I think it is superfluous. --David
