On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 15:01 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 19:13 +1000, David Crossley wrote:
Due to all these fancy filename extensions for text files, committers are going to need to configure their SVN clients accordingly.
http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-124
Sorry, but I did not want to have 3 different files called *.xsl. I needed the extensions to not loose the overview.
*.fn - forrest:nugget *.ft - forrest:template *.fv - forrest:view
...but go ahead and harmonize them if you want (IMO will be more work then add the 3 different extensions). ;-)
If they are XSL shuld they not be called XSL?
The view is xml but cannot be called *.xml because it is in the xdocs dir.
forrest:templates are xml with embedded xsl:stylesheet. ...but this is the first supported format, other formats are planed for support in the future.
forrest:nugget is right now (only the feeder contract nugget exists!!!)
pure xsl. The question is whether that will change in the future (see
[DISCUSS] feeder plugin contract in the view).
OK, I understand.
Can we put them in subdirectories to indicate their purpose.
They all have certain dirs where they go in a project:
This suggestion is not really relevant given your comments above
Ross
