Dave Brondsema wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > >Dave Brondsema wrote: > > > >><motd-page-url>/docs/</motd-page-url> doesn't work if these docs are > >>standalone (e.g on my machine). > > > > > >Yeah, sorry. I knew it would make a broken link for local docs, > >but thought that it was more important to get the website happening > >at this stage. > > > > Good point. Now that I think more about it, it's probably ok as-is. > Local dev docs may have a broken link, but when we have a real release > that notification won't be there so local docs from a release won't have > any problems.
Hold on. I thought that we were having the notification (about which version) on every page under /docs/ regardless of whether it is released. > >Would it help to use a full URL to the online docs? In my working copy, i have that now as a full URL to an explanatory page at forrest.apache.org/docs.html which links to each version of the docs, i.e. /docs/0.6/ and /docs/0.7/ and the next -dev docs at /docs/0.8/ --David
