On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 10:36 +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > Gidday, > > > > here is a proposal for a new skinconf format. > > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/forrest/trunk/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.viewHelper/src/documentation/skinconf.proposal.xml?view=auto&rev=160783 > > +0 > > > This is based on the recent user discussion (skinconf text elements in > > group.svg) which showed again that our skinconf needs to be more > > extensible without touching the dtd. > > +1 > > > e.g. > > <forrest:property contract="copyright"> > > <!-- The following are used to construct a copyright statement --> > > <year>2005</year> > > <vendor>The Apache Software Foundation.</vendor> > > <copyright-link>http://www.apache.org/licenses/</copyright-link> > > </forrest:property> > > > > The idea is to allow all xml within a forrest:property. > > What about the proposal already in SVN, that we have discussed before? > Why not make the DTD completely correct without having all xml inside > forrest:property?
Can you post the link of the proposal, I could not find it. ...I could remember the discussion but could not find the proposal. Cheers for the headsup. salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
