Ross Gardler wrote:
RG> But that simply is not correct. It *is* configurable as I have written RG> on a number of occasions now.
Sorry, I shouldn't respond to messages one by one. That way I missed your solution in 'Re: Inkonsistency in implementation of default file and site.xml and what to do about it' when I wrote my reply.
One of the reasons for keeping everything in one thread. This particular issue spanned three different threads because of subject changes. It's sometimes very difficult to know when to change the subject. I always try not too unless I have totally changed the direction the thread is taking.
Will adjust documentation accordingly.
I saw that - it's great to see someone actually documenting what is discussed here.
Thanks!!!
Ross
