Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Hi,
i am looking at how we use status.xml, and these are my impressions:

1) I always like it status.xml to be on the root of out svn space, so
when you make a change you could modify it over there. Can we change
that back?

I have no feelings in this whatsoever.

2) I tried to put the document type of status and I have found around
400 validation errors. they are mostly on the context attributes.

:-))

I did exactly the same thing and decided it was too big a job to fix in the middle of the night when I did it, so I ran away ;-)

The valid attributes are "build,code,docs,admin,design"

My proposal is to add documentation about the scope of every single
attribute ie:
build ---> our build system and tools that make the sofware
code  ---> xsl,sitemaps and java code that we use
docs  ---> our website, and documentation of the project.
design --> �?�? skins maybe?

I'd put skins under code, especially with view/viewhelper coming along which blurs the distinction even more.


design would be things like refactoring?

out of that I am happy to help to convert all of those.

I'm still running away, so feel free ;-)

Ross



Reply via email to