Ross Gardler wrote:
> Yes - and perhaps you didn't know that because the docs need updating > (that's the issue I linked to earlier, hint hint - only if you have time > of course, please don't feel badgered by my point this out repeatedly) will do that when this whole issue is cleared up and descided and I know what is now and what will be. >> But then I don't understand the ongoing discussion about putting >> images in resources. Are they not also unprocessed content? > Images seem to be an exception, but I can't tell you why. Perhaps we can > move this part of the discussion to the docs reorg. thread. Yes, fine by me. I'll mention it there. -- Ferdinand Soethe
