Antonio Gallardo wrote: > David Crossley dijo: > > scott hutinger wrote: > >> > >> If a newer version of xerces were in place, I would say yes. But that > >> is not the case, as xerces has not released anything as of yet. > >> That isn't truly Ant related, but just one point of view. > > > > We can use pre-releases of these supporting products, we don't > > need to wait for a final release. An svn snapshot is fine. > > > > If people have an actual need for updated libraries, then > > please say so. We can add them now, because we will be > > going into a testing phase soon. > > > >> Ross Gardler wrote: > >> >Is there any justification for delaying our release in order > >> >to include this version of ANT? > > > > See above for an alternative. I suggest, with our imminent > > release, that we stick with what we have working now. > > I suggest to add ant 2.6.3. It brings better java 1.5 support and lot of > fixes: > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/ant/WHATSNEW?only_with_tag=ANT_163&view=markup
Okay, i for one, am happy that "somebody" updates our libraries. WDOT --David
