Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:39 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
...
So in conclusion, I agree with Gregors concerns, but I also agree
with the direction Thorsten is trying to go in.
Actually that is the reason why I am proposing that forrest is *not*
officially developing views anymore.
Woaahhhh!!!!
It's very late for me now, I've had many beers and a bottle of wine so I
am not about to try and sort this mess out now. However....
Thorsten, please listen to Nicola Ken's very wise words below
(inparticular the first part - "please reconsider".
I'll explain my original comments in detail tomorrow - for now I hope it
is enough to say you have misinterpreted the intent of my mail.
Ross
Please reconsider. You are getting unnecessarily carried away by your
emotion. Don't mistakenly read mails as if they were personal complaints
when they are not.
...
I do not see that it get accepted better said it is causing confusion
and concerns by user.
Let me be brutally honest with you, as you are being so too with this mail.
Forrest needs a view system that is better than the current skins, and
what you are doing is generally in line with what I have in mind. You
like it, you have passion, and this is good.
On the other hand, your descriptions of the system are sometimes totally
incomprehensible. If I hadn't seen the code and did not have a similar
concept in mind, I think I would have not understood.
I think it's about time that I check out your work and give you
feedback. Where do I start?
