> I am +1 to use your skin as dev version for views this will allow to
> concentrate on the contracts and not the css.
>
> Can we use yours? Then I do not have to worry anymore about tweaking the
> scale-dev and finally got rid of the css-overhead.
Sure!
> For submitting a skin with view/viewHelper you will need to provide the
> following resources (* - required):
> a)* default.fv
> b)* default.css
> c) additional-contracts (*.ft)
Coming up. Should I put them on Jira or just post to the list? I'll go
with JIRA for now.
> Actually I am thinking about changing the 'default' naming to
> {skin-name}.fv/css in the matching code, that will enable different
> skins more easy.
>
> WDYT?
Hmm. Sounds ok, except I haven't got a "name" for my skin as of now :(
Creative minds please come forth. I'm inclined to call it
"minimalistic" :D
Diwaker
--
Diwaker Gupta
http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker
