Ross Gardler wrote: > It is a good idea to clearly mark deprecated DTD's. In fact I would go a > step further and say we move them to a deprecatedDTD plugin. This would > be an internal plugin. This would leave only active DTD's in core so new > users will not be tempted to use deprecated ones.
Certainly worth consideration. > However, it is not as simple as it may sound. For example, document1.3 > extends document 1.2 which extends document 1.1, therefore for document > 1.3 we need all earlier versions. It would therefore seem that the first > step would be to do as you propose, move the earlier DTD's into a > deprecated folder and think about the next step later. Yes, I figured that we have more important issues to program so I took a simple solution. Besides, this solution would be more general and could also be applied to old howtos such as the one on CVS-SSH. (Although we could donate that to projects still using CVS :-)) -- Ferdinand Soethe