David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:

Summarising ...

http://f.a.o/docs_0_60/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.6
http://f.a.o/docs_0_70/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.7
http://f.a.o/docs_0_80/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.8

There will no longer be the "current version" at f.a.o/docs/

Assuming that FOR-544 goes ahead:

http://f.a.o/pluginDocs/plugins_0_70/index.html will be the index of valid plugins for the 0.7 version of Forrest http://f.a.o/pluginDocs/plugins_0_80/index.html will be the index of valid plugins for the 0.8 version of Forrest

http://f.a.o/pluginDocs/plugins_0_70/PLUGINNAME will be the latest docs for the most recent release of the indicated plugin for version 0.7 of Forrest http://f.a.o/pluginDocs/plugins_0_80/PLUGINNAME will be the latest docs for the most recent release of the indicated plugin for version 0.8 of Forrest


Now i have a question about the "Plugins" tab of the documentation as shown
in release candidate rc1 and of course the current trunk.

It currently points to /docs/plugins/index.html and shows the plugins that are
available for the current release. So does that now need to be changed to be
rather /pluginDocs/plugins_0_70/index.html ?

Also there are two other docs referred to on its menu:
usingPlugins.html
pluginInfrastructure.html

Should those two documents be also inside /pluginDocs/plugins_0_70/
because they may change over time.


index.xml is generated dynamically in sitemap.xmap from the plugins.xml file. This can go anywhere as long as the match is changed in sitemap.xmap

The two others are Forrest documents and in my opinion should be versioned. They were in the versioned documents but Ferdinand moved them out and I gave up trying to convince him they should be left in since he had many other more important distractions at the time.

I suppose they could go into the versioned plugin docs directories.

Ross

Reply via email to